I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but I'm not sure if it would be fair to call heteroflexible as well as homoflexible a subset of bisexuality. I reckon they should be recognised as two different things completely, because it kind of reminds me of how some people think pansexuality is a subset of bisexuality, and I disagree with that, because they're two separate things entirely. I can't say that much for it though, because I'm not hetero/homoflexible and I don't know what they think.
this sounds fair. maybe every sexuality/identity should be acknowledged as its own independent thing so it isn’t compared to others? at least that might be what I’ll try to do, that way anyone identifying as something that could be compared (like how I said heteroflexible seemed like a subset of bisexual) can chose for themselves whether they mind the comparison or not.
did that make sense?